For the first time, our top recommendation is to give to our new All Grants Fund, which we allocate to any need that meets our cost-effectiveness bar. We were unable to identify additional funding opportunities at Helen Keller International that we thought were more cost-effective than (or as cost-effective as) the funding opportunities available at other top charities. How often does GiveWell update impact numbers? WebWe are happy to accept donations via Qualified Charitable Distributions from individuals accounts. While we have now updated our analysis of the impact of our grantmaking to include some information about funds directed in 2022, we have not yet assessed whether to update our cost-effectiveness estimates for pre-2020 funds directed to rely on our cost-effectiveness estimates from 2022. Keeping an up-to-date estimate of how marginal funds would be spent would create an unnecessary administrative burden. WebThis table includes all grants to GiveDirectly that GiveWell had the discretion to make, or recommended to another funder, since 2014.1 Information about grants made prior to 2014 is available upon request. WebEmail: info@givewell.org. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons, we expected to be funding-constrained this year, Why were funding clubfoot treatment through MiracleFeet, Why GiveWell funded the rollout of the malaria vaccine. GiveWell, aka The Clear Fund (a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) public charity), was founded in 2007. WebIn January and February 2017, GiveWell staff visited the END Funds work in Kigali, Rwanda and Idwji, Democratic Republic of Congo. Giving What We Can does not take any fees from donors using our platform or from charities listed on our platform. WebIn May 2022, GiveWell recommended a $35 million grant 1 to New Incentives. Name of the person who should be notified about this donation. Weve rounded cost per output numbers to the nearest dollar (up or down). WebNo, we collect no fees from donations to support our top charities. [1] If we reach our goal of $600 million this year, we speculatively guess that that funding would save around 70,000 lives. We wanted to better understand the impact of the growing COVID-19 pandemic on charities budgets and plans before making a decision about where funding would have the greatest impact. We think its the best bet for donors who want to support the most promising opportunities weve found to help people, regardless of program or location. WebCOVID-19 Small Business Relief Fund. WebGiveWell's mission is to find outstanding giving opportunities and publish the full details of our analysis to help donors decide where to give. Not sure what's best for you? For this reason, we dont expect additional donations to Helen Keller International to be more cost-effective than donations to our other top charities. 123. Support for deworming programs in six countries for one year and three countries for two years ($16.4 million, 81% of the grant).1 These are countries where we model the cost-effectiveness as above our bar for making a grant (discussion below). WebWe grant funds from the Top Charities Fund to the recipient charity (or charities) on a rolling basis throughout the year. WebThank you for thinking of GiveWell in your long-term planning. In January 2023, GiveWell made a $5.2 million grant to Evidence Action's Deworm the World. We are providing 2021 averages for AMF because we made only one grant to AMF in our 2022 metrics year, and our cost-effectiveness estimate for that grant was based on incomplete information about how funding from the grant would be used and is likely unrepresentative of the funding we typically direct to AMF. Donations to the All Grants Fund may be allocated to any grant that meets GiveWell's cost-effectiveness bar, including funding opportunities outside its top charities. For example, one study found that ITNs are less effective in some locations, such as Myanmar, "where the principal malaria vectors bite outdoors early in the evening, before people go in or near their ITN." WebPlanned activities and budget. We start here because an organization's choice of which program to implement is one of the most important factors affecting the impact it can have. If youd like to donate directly to one of our top charities, you can find a list of links here. Helen Keller International appears to be especially cost-effective because the average programs we funded there in 2021 and 2022 were especially cost-effective. $16.8 million to New Incentives . Added October 2022: From 2020 to 2022 we used the name Maximum Impact Fund to refer to the fund used to support the highest-priority funding needs among our top charities each quarter. Answers to frequently asked questions are available below. More information on the tax-deductibility of donations to our top charities, including for donors outside the US and The Netherlands, is available here. Grants. We thoroughly vet these organizations and assess whether they meet our criteria. GiveWell donors contributed over $240 million to our recommended charities (our 2020 money moved), a 60% increase from the approximately $150 million we We dont think our models are precise enough to actually differentiate between differences in cost-effectiveness of only a few hundred dollars, so weve rounded estimates up to the nearest $500 to better convey this. We adjust our cost-effectiveness model to account for insecticide resistance here: "We define LLIN coverage as the proportion of people living in households that were targeted by an AMF distribution who subsequently sleep under LLINs, thereby benefiting from the protective effect against malaria. WebDonate to GiveWell. WebGiveWell's Impact. Do these cost-effectiveness estimates include all factors that are relevant for choosing which programs to fund? The purpose of our cost-effectiveness analyses is to help GiveWell make better decisions about how best to allocate funds between different programs. Last updated: December 2022 (February 2022 version). Checks may be made payable to GiveWell. The All Grants Fund supports the full range of GiveWells grantmaking and can be allocated to any grant that meets our cost-effectiveness barincluding opportunities outside of our top charities and riskier grants with high expected value. WebIn January 2023, GiveWell recommended a $5,210,581 grant to MiracleFeet to scale up its existing clubfoot treatment program in the Philippines and expand to Chad and Cte dIvoire over five years. The grant will support deworming in Madagascar, Burundi, and Mauritania for two ", "Interestingly, nets with no holes had an average of just over one mosquito per net. Marginal funding is the last funding that goes to a program. You can find more information on what goes into our cost-effectiveness estimates here. For questions about donating, please contact donations@givewell.org. This donation will support the full range of GiveWells grantmaking. This search returns results from both GiveWell's main site and from the GiveWell Blog. WebSummary. GiveWell, aka The Clear Fund (a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) public charity), was founded in 2007. Our cost-effectiveness estimates can differ between funding opportunities. WebFor a list of all grants that GiveWell has made or recommended to Helen Keller International, see GiveWell, "All Content on Helen Keller International's Vitamin A Supplementation Program," 2021. Tips for Donating. By estimating cost-effectiveness at a more granular level, we are better able to recommend funding to multiple charities and direct funding to the most cost-effective opportunities on the margin. Below are just a few examples of what the money we raise this year will likely fund: Were thrilled about the expected impact of the above grants, all of which we estimate are above our bar of 10 times as cost-effective as cash transfers. See here for a step-by-step walkthrough using a specific AMF distribution in Guinea. Research Overview; Research on Programs; Our Criteria; Cost-Effectiveness Analyses; How We Produce Impact Estimates; Our Mistakes; About. WebWe recommended two additional grants to IDinsight, totaling $1,206,000 and funded through the Effective Altruism Global Health and Development Fund, in June and August 2020. Before deciding to apply, we encourage you to closely review our criteria to gauge your fit for GiveWell's recommendations. WebThis donation is designated for the support of GiveWells All Grants Fund. To move forward with making a legacy gift in the United States, you will need our legal name, EIN, and address: The Clear Fund dba While nets are distributed to people who are at risk of malaria, even without nets, a fairly small portion of them would die due to the disease. If youre an impact-focused donor, we ask that you give what you can this year to help reduce the gapwith the knowledge that youll be contributing toward exceptionally cost-effective work. We often model different types of benefits from an intervention. You can see more detail in this spreadsheet. These typically refer to a pool of funding directed to a charity's activities in a single country or subnational region. For example, our estimates do not include: Because of these limitations, a cost-effectiveness analysis is not the only tool we use when we decide whether to allocate funding to a program. In addition, although the nets are highly effective, the nets do not prevent malaria 100% of the time. In September 2022, we changed the name of this fund to the Top Charities Fund to better describe what opportunities this fund supports; more information here. In January 2023, GiveWell recommended that Open Philanthropy grant $11.2 million to Sightsavers. In 2006 Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld, who worked at a See below for more on all three of our giving funds. See the addendum at the top of the grant page for more context. We recommended a larger grant and two follow-up grants to Innovations for Poverty Action, totaling $3,140,000, in July, November, and December 2020. Why does GiveWell compare programs to cash transfers? It allows donors to contribute to the most impactful grant opportunities weve identified, regardless of program or location. But that wouldnt be the impact of your donation. We serve donors across the globe; GiveWell's donors are based primarily in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Canada. Rather than trying to estimate the marginal impact of each dollar, GiveWell typically estimates the marginal impact of giving to a charitys funding opportunities. When making decisions about how to allocate funding, we estimate the marginal dollar based on a projection of how much funding charities will receive from other sources (including donors who give to a specific charity on the basis of GiveWell's recommendation) between now and when the funds will be needed, as well as in the past. WebA small number of GiveWell staff now have the opportunity to recommend a certain amount of discretionary funding annually. WebThis is the November 2021 version of the page that lists all grants made or recommended by GiveWell since 2014, including Incubation Grants and other grants made by Good Ventures and Open Philanthropy. This search returns results from both GiveWell's main site and from the GiveWell Blog. Purpose: To support critical needs of the southeast Michigan small business community amid the crisis of COVID-19 Activities: Taking action Why does GiveWell share the impact of grants rather than donations? Oakland, CA 94612. GiveWell donors contributed over $150 million to our recommended charities in 2019. Donations to the All Grants Fund may be allocated to any grant that meets our cost-effectiveness bar. While I believe that all of GiveWells recommended charities are excellent giving opportunities, I plan to deviate from GiveWells recommendation and give 100% to GiveDirectly this year. Some grants have the goal of incubating, scaling, or getting more certainty around a potential future top charity. This means that we may reach a different estimate of cost-effectiveness for some past grants if we were to re-evaluate them now. Thanks so much for your support! In 2018, we tracked over $140 million in donations to the charities we recommend as a result of our research. You can see a record of all our grants to GiveDirectly since 2014 on this page. Is vitamin A supplementation the best program GiveWell recommends? To avoid sharing potentially misleading estimates, we share the impact of grants from the pool of funding we direct to funding opportunities. (May be the same as the dedication name). These nets are hung over sleeping spaces and block and kill malaria-carrying mosquitoes. New Incentives runs a conditional cash transfer (CCT) program in North West Nigeria which seeks to increase uptake of routine immunizations through cash transfers, raising public History. You can learn more about all of our giving funds here. We categorize grants by year according to the date we decided to make or recommend them, not the date funds were disbursed. Funds directed to our top charities by GiveWell can be grouped in five buckets: We calculate the cost-effectiveness of specific funding opportunities, not the cost-effectiveness of all the funding an organization uses.

Impact Of Teacher Professional Development On Student Achievement, Food For Goat Farming, Disney Princess For A Day Cost, Articles G